Simulation of the effect laminate sequence on delamination mode-I with elastic couplings
 
More details
Hide details
1
University of Babylon in the Materials Engineering. Iraq
 
2
University of Karbala in the Prosthetic Limb Engineering. Iraq
 
 
Submission date: 2022-04-20
 
 
Final revision date: 2022-05-24
 
 
Acceptance date: 2022-05-30
 
 
Online publication date: 2022-06-07
 
 
Publication date: 2022-06-07
 
 
Corresponding author
Mustafa Abd Alhussein   

University of Babylon in the Materials Engineering
 
 
Diagnostyka 2022;23(2):2022211
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
A numerical study using the ANSYS 19.R3 environment is discussed in this research. This environment depends on the Virtual Crack Closure Technique (VCCT) method to test a double cantilever beam (DCB) according to the ASTM D5528 standard. Four kinds of laminate stacking sequences were considered. According to the results, the distribution of the strain energy release rates obtained along the delamination front in bending-extension and extension-twisting coupling had a good affinity with bending-extension coupling. At the same time, critical fracture toughness values were estimated to be around 87.9% of critical fracture toughness values bending-extension coupling. These results are proof of the bending-extension and extension-twisting coupling success while testing the proximity to bending-extension coupling results of the DCB beam. These findings are compatible with the standard ASTM D5288. Therefore, the bending-extension and extension-twisting coupling provide a good indication of the delamination resistance during buckling tests of the composite.
 
REFERENCES (42)
1.
Bolotin VV. Mechanics of delaminations in laminate composite structures. Mech. Compos. Mater. 2001; 37(5):367–380. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014....
 
2.
Andersons J, König M. Dependence of fracture toughness of composite laminates on interface ply orientations and delamination growth direction. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2004;64(13–14):2139–2152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comp....
 
3.
Kao-Walter S, Sthle P, Hägglund R. Fracture toughness of a laminated composite. Eur. Struct. Integr. Soc. 2003;32(C):355–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1566-....
 
4.
ASTM D5528-01. Standard test method for mode I interlaminar fracture toughness of unidirectional fiber-reinforced polymer matrix composites. Am. Stand. Test. Methods. 2007;03.
 
5.
Orifici AC, Krueger R. Benchmark assessment of automated delamination propagation capabilities in finite element codes for static loading. Finite Element. 2012;54:28–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fine....
 
6.
Krueger R. The virtual crack closure technique for modeling interlaminar failure and delamination in advanced composite materials. Elsevier Ltd., 2015.
 
7.
Krueger R, O’Brien TKO. A shell/3D modeling technique for the analysis of delaminated composite laminates. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2001;32(1):25–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-....
 
8.
Teter A, Debski H, Samborski S. On buckling collapse and failure analysis of thin-walled composite lipped-channel columns subjected to uniaxial compression. Thin-Walled Struct. 2014;85:324–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.....
 
9.
Kubiak T, Samborski S, Teter A. Experimental investigation of failure process in compressed channel-section GFRP laminate columns assisted with the acoustic emission method. Compos. Struct. 2015;133:921–929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comp....
 
10.
Pereira AB, de Morais AB. Mode I interlaminar fracture of carbon/epoxy multidirectional laminates. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2004;64(13–14):2261–2270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comp....
 
11.
Chai H. The characterization of mode I delamination failure in non-woven, multidirectional laminates. Composites.1984;15(4):277–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4....
 
12.
Karmakov S, Cepero-Mejías F, Curiel-Sosa JL. Numerical analysis of the delamination in CFRP laminates: VCCT and XFEM assessment. Compos. Part C Open Access. 2020;2:100014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcom....
 
13.
Krueger R. Virtual crack closure technique: History, approach, and applications. Appl. Mech. Rev. 2004; 57(1–6):109–143. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1595....
 
14.
Rybicki EF, Kanninen MF. A finite element calculation of stress intensity factors by a modified crack closure integral. Eng. Fract. Mech. 1977;9(4): 931–938. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7....
 
15.
Shen F, Lee KH, Tay TE. Modeling delamination growth in laminated composites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2001;61(9):1239–1251. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-....
 
16.
Xie G, Biggers SB. Progressive crack growth analysis using interface element based on the virtual crack closure technique. Finite Elem. Anal. Des. 2006;42(11):977–984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fine....
 
17.
Liu PF, Hou SJ, Chu KJ, Hu XY, Zhou CL, Liu YL, Zheng JY, Zhao A, Yan L. Finite element analysis of postbuckling and delamination of composite laminates using virtual crack closure technique. Compos. Struct. 2011;93(6):1549–1560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comp....
 
18.
Shivakumar KN, Tan PW, Newman JC Jr. A virtual crack-closure technique for calculating stress intensity factors for cracked three dimensional bodies. 1988.
 
19.
Xie D, Biggers SB. Strain energy release rate calculation for a moving delamination front of arbitrary shape based on the virtual crack closure technique. Part I: Formulation and validation. Eng. Fract. Mech. 2006;73(6): 771–785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engf....
 
20.
Xie D, Biggers SB. Strain energy release rate calculation for a moving delamination front of arbitrary shape based on the virtual crack closure technique. Part II: Sensitivity study on modeling details. Eng. Fract. Mech. 2006;73(6):786–801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engf....
 
21.
Carvalho N, Chen B, Pinho S, Ratcliffe J, Baiz PM, Tay TE. Modeling delamination migration in cross-ply tape laminates. Composites Part A: Applied science and manufacturing. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comp....
 
22.
Riccio A, Raimondo A, Scaramuzzino F. A study on skin delaminations growth in stiffened composite panels by a novel numerical approach. Appl. Compos. Mater. 2013;20(4):465–488. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10443....
 
23.
Turon A, Camanho PP, Costa J, Renart J. Accurate simulation of delamination growth under mixed-mode loading using cohesive elements: Definition of interlaminar strengths and elastic stiffness. Compos. Struct. 2010;92(8):1857–1864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comp....
 
24.
Turon A, Dávila CG, Camanho PP, Costa J. An engineering solution for mesh size effects in the simulation of delamination using cohesive zone models. Eng. Fract. Mech. 2007;74(10): 1665–1682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engf....
 
25.
Herakovich C. Mechanics of fibrous composites. New York: NY: J. Wiley and Sons, 1998.
 
26.
Jones RM. Mechanics of Composite Materials. Philadelphia: PA: Taylor & Francis, 1999.
 
27.
Reddy J. Mechanics of laminated composite plates and shells. Theory and analysis. Boca Raton: FL: CRC Press, 2004.
 
28.
Altenbach H, Altenbach J, Kissing W. Mechanics of composite structural elements. Berlin: Springer, 2013.
 
29.
York CB. Tapered hygro-thermally curvature-stable laminates with non-standard ply orientations. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2013;44(1): 140–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comp....
 
30.
De Morais AB, De Moura M, Gonçalves JPM, Camanho PP. Analysis of crack propagation in double cantilever beam tests of multidirectional laminates. Mech. Mater. 2003;35(7):641–652. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-....
 
31.
Samborski S. Numerical analysis of the DCB test configuration applicability to mechanically coupled Fiber Reinforced Laminated Composite beams. Compos. Struct. 2016;152:477–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comp....
 
32.
Samborski S. Analysis of the end-notched flexure test configuration applicability for mechanically coupled fiber reinforced composite laminates. Compos. Struct. 2017;163:342–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comp....
 
33.
Samborski S. Prediction of delamination front’s advancement direction in the CFRP laminates with mechanical couplings subjected to different fracture toughness tests. Compos. Struct. 2018;202:643–650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comp....
 
34.
Davidson BD, Krüger R, König M. Effect of stacking sequence on energy release rate distributions in multidirectional DCB and ENF specimens. Eng. Fract. Mech. 1996;55(4):557–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-....
 
35.
Davidson BD, Kruger R, König M. Three dimensional analysis and resulting design recommendations for unidirectional and multidirectional end-notched flexure tests. J. Compos. Mater. 1995;29(16):2108–2133. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199....
 
36.
Krueger R. Virtual crack closure technique: History, approach, and applications. Appl. Mech. Rev. 2004; 57(2):109–143. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1595....
 
37.
Reeder JR. 3D mixed-mode delamination fracture criteria - An experimentalist’s perspective. Am. Soc. Compos. - 21st Tech. Conf. Am. Soc. Compos. 2006;1:129–145.
 
38.
ANSYS Inc. ANSYS Composite PrepPost User’s Guide.
 
39.
Kenane M. Measurement Of Mixed-Mode Delamination Fracture Toughness Of Unidirectional Glass/Epoxy Composites With Mixed-Mode Bending Apparatus. Ann. Endocrinol. 1963;24: 859–865.
 
40.
Kenane M, Benzeggagh M. Mixed-mode delamination fracture toughness of unidirectional glass/epoxy composites under fatigue loading. Compos. Sci. Technol. 1997;57(5):597–605. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-....
 
41.
de Moura M, Campilho R, Gonçalves J. Crack equivalent concept applied to the fracture characterization of bonded joints under pure mode I loading. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2008;68(10–11): 2224–2230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comp....
 
42.
Sun CT Zheng S. Delamination characteristics of double- cantilever beam and end-notched flexure composite specimens. Strain. 1996;56:451–459. https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-3....
 
eISSN:2449-5220
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top